- Ville de Montréal. Section des archives
- Fonds Sir Louis-Hippolyte La Fontaine. - 1830-1864, surtout 1837-1851.
- Correspondance . - 1835-1864
- Lettre de G. W. Wicksteed à Louis-Hippolyte La Fontaine . - Août 1858
SHM2-1P0826_op.pdfOpen full screen ↗
Ville de Montréal. Section des archives · in your browser's PDF viewer, from archivesdemontreal.ica-atom.org. Ctrl F (⌘ F) searches its text, if the scan has any. Blank? The archive doesn't allow embedding: use “Open full screen”.
Lettre de G. W. Wicksteed à Louis-Hippolyte La Fontaine . - Août 1858
This description was harvested from its parent's finding aid, but the source catalogue gave no direct link for it. The link opens the nearest enclosing description; look there for SHM002-1-P0826.
- Held by
- Ville de Montréal. Section des archives via Archives de Montréal (Ville de Montréal)
- Dates
- Août 1858 (indexed as 1858)
- Level
- item
- Scope & content
- G. W. Wicksteed signifie à La Fontaine qu'il n'a aucune correction à apporter à différents textes de lois. Titre basé sur le contenu de la pièce. Le document est en anglais. La pièce portait originellement le numéro 000826.
- In the picture
- DocumentGovernmentHandwrittenLegal DocumentLetterRegulationSignatureTagged automatically by a vision model; may contain mistakes.
- Location
No place found in this description yet.
Where
More details
- Extent
- 1 document textuel (1 page).
- Format
- Document
- What the image shows
- A handwritten letter in dark ink on aged cream paper, written in English in a cursive hand with a salutation line at the top and a few lines of text per paragraph. It discusses sections of an Act and the wording of a legal clause, with some words crossed out and replaced above the line. A faint stamp or watermark reading Archives de la Ville de Montréal appears at the upper right, and a reference number is written in the top left corner.Described automatically by a vision model; may contain mistakes.
- Text in the image
- My dear Sir,I donot see anything inconsistent in the 1st and 2nd sections of the new Customs Act – thought the latter would perhaps have been clearer if the word "is" in line 5 had been "bring."Read automatically; may contain mistakes.
- Harvested
- 2026-10-16T18:07:08Z · source datestamp n/a · ead
Digital objects at the source
- pdfOpen original at source ↗SHM2-1P0826_op.pdfRead here